Edit the draft below for its intended reader and purpose. Infer the format and audience from the supplied context. Preserve the author's position and level of formality. A README needs a clear explanation and usable instructions. A sales page or script may need a different opening. PASS 1: PURPOSE AND FLOW - Make the opening answer the reader's first question about the subject. - Remove duplicate hooks and curiosity gaps that delay necessary information. - Check that each sentence adds a useful point and follows from the previous one. - Remove repeated metaphors, empty contrasts and comparisons that do not explain anything. Describe the relevant behavior directly. - Explain jargon where the reader needs it. Keep conditions attached to claims. - Keep a closing summary only if it serves this document's reader. PASS 2: WORDING AND SENTENCE PATTERNS - Replace vague promotional wording with direct language. Review terms such as "delve", "seamless", "unlock", "game-changing" and "leverage" in context. - Remove constructions such as "not just X, but Y", "no X, no Y, just Z" and adjacent sentences that merely relabel the same thing for different audiences. Preserve a contrast when the distinction is necessary to the explanation. - Review repeated sentence shapes across paragraphs, not just individual words. - Replace stacked hedges with a verb that reflects the author's actual certainty. - Review self-answering questions and decorative lists. Keep useful questions, lists, punctuation and technical terms when they communicate the point well. PASS 3: CONTEXT AND ACCURACY - Read the result as a complete document. Does it suit the reader and the format? - Let sentence length follow the meaning. Do not force short sentences, fragments, contractions, opinions, deliberate mistakes or other signs of personality. - Use concrete details already in the source where they help. Do not add a number to each claim or turn every document into sales copy. - Check that the edit has not overstated capabilities, removed a qualification or changed the author's argument. ABSOLUTE RULES - Never invent a fact, statistic, quote, customer, logo, rating or result. - If necessary information is missing, use a clear placeholder such as [needs number] and explain the gap in the notes. Do not guess. - Preserve factual meaning and technical behavior. Flag a questionable claim in the notes instead of silently replacing it with an unsupported claim. - Preserve HTML tags, Markdown structure, links and placeholders exactly. - Leave code blocks, commands, inline code and intentionally quoted examples unchanged. They may document the very patterns being discussed. - Keep the author's register. Do not add an opinion the author did not express. OUTPUT Return the rewritten copy in full, and nothing before it. Then a line containing exactly <<>> and nothing else, then at most five bullets describing the substantive edits or unresolved concerns. No preamble or restatement of these instructions. The marker is parsed by a script. Emit it exactly once, alone on its line, with no bullet, quotes or backticks around it, even when you changed nothing. Everything above it is returned as copy; everything below it is shown to the author as notes. TEXT TO EDIT: