{ "schemaVersion": "4.3", "meta": { "title": "方法实验室：顺序系统学习示例", "creator": "自编合成材料", "sourceType": "document", "mode": "overview", "pageId": "method-lab-sequential-systematic-v1", "learningDepth": "systematic", "language": "zh-CN", "initialTheme": "warm-paper", "knowledgeBase": "sequential-systematic.learnkb/INDEX.md" }, "hero": { "eyebrow": "方法实验室 · 交互学习", "title": "方法实验室：顺序系统学习示例", "lede": "自编的三页材料，演示问题边界、证据判断、小试验及其条件与反馈。", "thesis": "先界定问题，再核查证据，用小试验更新判断；没有证据时暂停结论。" }, "relationships": [ { "id": "map-rule", "from": "f-map", "to": "r-map", "type": "applies", "explanation": "范围不清楚时，画问题地图使边界与成功标准可用于判断。", "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页" }, { "id": "evidence-rule", "from": "f-evidence", "to": "r-evidence", "type": "applies", "explanation": "寻找反证是检验依据不足的主张的一种方法。", "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页" }, { "id": "action-rule", "from": "f-action", "to": "r-test", "type": "applies", "explanation": "讨论停滞时，有信息价值的小试验开启行动循环。", "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" }, { "id": "feedback-evidence", "from": "f-action", "to": "f-evidence", "type": "feedback", "explanation": "试验结果为证据链提供新的观察。", "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" }, { "id": "feedback-map", "from": "f-action", "to": "f-map", "type": "feedback", "explanation": "约束变化可能需要重新查看问题地图。", "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" }, { "id": "map-evidence", "from": "f-map", "to": "f-evidence", "type": "supports", "explanation": "明确的边界可以帮助聚焦证据收集。这是分析性联系，并非材料规定的必然顺序。", "evidence": "inference", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab · PDF第1–2页" } ], "footer": "自编合成教学材料，按 MIT 许可发布；不是某篇真实论文，也不代表实证研究结论。", "contentUnits": [ { "id": "u01", "label": "单元 1", "title": "界定问题", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "core": "选择行动前先明确范围。", "frameworks": [ "问题地图" ], "takeaways": [ "指出边界与相关方。", "明确约束和成功标准。" ], "conclusions": [ { "title": "先明确边界再行动", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "summary": "问题地图帮助识别哪些信息与问题相关。", "points": [ "记录问题包含哪些内容。", "选择可观察的成功标准。" ] } ], "sourceDetails": { "core": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "frameworks": [ "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页" ], "takeaways": [ "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页" ], "conclusions": [ { "summary": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "points": [ "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页" ] } ] } }, { "id": "u02", "label": "单元 2", "title": "检验主张", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "core": "观察与解释是两回事。", "frameworks": [ "证据链" ], "takeaways": [ "把结论追溯到观察。", "寻找其他解释与反证。" ], "conclusions": [ { "title": "证据不自动等于证明", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "summary": "一次观察可能对应多种解释。", "points": [ "区分观察到什么和它可能意味着什么。", "寻找可能挑战当前主张的证据。" ] } ], "sourceDetails": { "core": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "frameworks": [ "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页" ], "takeaways": [ "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页" ], "conclusions": [ { "summary": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "points": [ "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页" ] } ] } }, { "id": "u03", "label": "单元 3", "title": "通过行动学习", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "core": "小试验应产生能改变下一步判断的信息。", "frameworks": [ "行动循环" ], "takeaways": [ "用低成本试验检验重要假设。", "扩大行动前对比结果与预测。", "相关证据无法核查时，暂停结论。" ], "conclusions": [ { "title": "把结果带回思考", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "summary": "结果可以更新证据链或问题边界。", "points": [ "对比结果与预测后修正假设，再扩大行动。", "约束变化时重新查看问题地图。", "这些工具不保证成功。", "证据缺口不足以支持成功判断。", "工具的顺序与适用性取决于问题和已有证据。" ] } ], "sourceDetails": { "core": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "frameworks": [ "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" ], "takeaways": [ "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" ], "conclusions": [ { "summary": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "points": [ "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" ] } ] } } ], "frameworks": [ { "id": "f-map", "name": "问题地图", "oneLine": "明确边界、相关方、约束和成功标准。", "when": "进入陌生或尚不明确的问题时", "firstUnitId": "u01", "sourceOrder": 1, "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页" }, { "id": "f-evidence", "name": "证据链", "oneLine": "把结论连到观察和其他可能的解释。", "when": "判断主张是否有充分依据时", "firstUnitId": "u02", "sourceOrder": 2, "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页" }, { "id": "f-action", "name": "行动循环", "oneLine": "检验假设，对比预测与结果，再修正。", "when": "把理解变成有信息价值的小行动时", "firstUnitId": "u03", "sourceOrder": 3, "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" } ], "glossary": [ { "id": "boundary", "term": "问题边界", "category": "领域术语", "definition": "当前要解决的问题的范围。", "context": "问题地图在行动前明确边界。", "related": [ "约束", "成功标准" ], "units": [ "u01" ], "firstUnitId": "u01", "sourceOrder": 1, "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页" }, { "id": "counterevidence", "term": "反证", "category": "领域术语", "definition": "可能挑战当前主张的证据。", "context": "证据链用反证检查信心，避免把一次观察当作证明。", "related": [ "观察", "其他解释" ], "units": [ "u02" ], "firstUnitId": "u02", "sourceOrder": 2, "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页" }, { "id": "feedback", "term": "反馈", "category": "方法框架", "definition": "用试验获得的信息修正假设或下一步行动。", "context": "行动循环对比结果与预测，并可更新此前的思考。", "related": [ "预测", "假设" ], "units": [ "u03" ], "firstUnitId": "u03", "sourceOrder": 3, "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" } ], "decisionRules": [ { "id": "r-map", "when": "问题范围不清楚", "do": "先画问题地图", "because": "边界有助于识别相关信息", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页" }, { "id": "r-evidence", "when": "对主张的信心不足", "do": "收集证据并寻找反证", "because": "一次观察不应被当作证明", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页" }, { "id": "r-test", "when": "讨论停滞", "do": "设计有信息价值的小试验", "because": "结果可以更新假设并指导下一步行动", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" }, { "id": "r-pause", "when": "相关证据无法核查", "do": "暂停结论", "because": "证据缺口不足以支持成功判断", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" } ], "assessment": { "focusAreas": [ { "id": "a-map", "title": "识别有用的问题边界", "unitId": "u01", "abilities": [ "解释", "应用" ], "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页" }, { "id": "a-evidence", "title": "区分观察与解释", "unitId": "u02", "abilities": [ "记忆", "解释" ], "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页" }, { "id": "a-action", "title": "设计有信息价值的小试验", "unitId": "u03", "abilities": [ "应用", "迁移" ], "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" } ] }, "methodLibrary": { "schemaVersion": "learn-from-materials/methods-v1", "libraryId": "method-lab", "title": "方法实验室：材料方法卡", "language": "zh-CN", "status": "extracted", "note": "来自合成教学材料的六张方法卡；条件、步骤和限制对应原文，英文原始引文保留供核对。", "methods": [ { "id": "f-map", "version": "1.0.0", "kind": "framework", "name": "问题地图", "summary": "明确边界、相关方、约束和成功标准。", "problem": "问题范围不清晰时，难以判断哪些信息相关。", "when": "进入陌生或尚不明确的问题时", "prerequisites": [ "能够描述问题和可观察的预期结果。" ], "limitations": [ "原文没有给出普遍成功保证或量化阈值。", "顺序与适用性取决于问题和现有证据。" ], "rationale": "明确边界有助于判断哪些信息相关。", "steps": [ { "action": "记录问题边界和相关方。", "input": "待解决的问题。", "output": "明确的范围与相关方清单。", "check": "检查清单中的事项是否属于问题范围。" }, { "action": "记录约束和可观察的成功标准。", "input": "已知约束与预期结果。", "output": "约束与成功标准。", "check": "确认成功标准可以观察。" } ], "successChecks": [ "边界、相关方、约束和可观察的成功标准均已明确。" ], "tags": [ "问题", "边界", "范围" ], "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "sources": [ { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00001" ], "quote": "Before choosing an action, record the problem boundary, stakeholders, constraints and an\n\nobservable success criterion." }, { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00003" ], "quote": "These methods are complementary tools, not a guarantee of success." } ], "parents": [] }, { "id": "f-evidence", "version": "1.0.0", "kind": "framework", "name": "证据链", "summary": "把结论连到观察和其他可能的解释。", "problem": "某项主张的支持不足，或存在多种可能解释。", "when": "判断主张是否有充分依据时", "prerequisites": [ "有可供检查的主张和相关观察。" ], "limitations": [ "原文没有给出普遍成功保证或量化阈值。", "顺序与适用性取决于问题和现有证据。" ], "rationale": "不能把单次观察当作证明。", "steps": [ { "action": "区分观察与解释。", "input": "主张与现有观察。", "output": "区分可观察事实和解释。", "check": "确认解释没有被写成直接观察。" }, { "action": "寻找其他解释与反证。", "input": "当前解释。", "output": "其他解释与相关证据。", "check": "不能把单次观察当作证明；原文未规定数字化证据阈值。" } ], "successChecks": [ "观察与解释已分开，也考虑了其他解释。" ], "tags": [ "证据", "主张", "反证" ], "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "sources": [ { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00002" ], "quote": "Separate observations from explanations. Link conclusions to observations and look for\n\ncompeting explanations." }, { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00003" ], "quote": "These methods are complementary tools, not a guarantee of success." } ], "parents": [] }, { "id": "f-action", "version": "1.0.0", "kind": "framework", "name": "行动循环", "summary": "检验假设，对比预测与结果，再修正。", "problem": "讨论停滞，缺少能帮助决策的信息。", "when": "把理解变成有信息价值的小行动时", "prerequisites": [ "一项重要假设可以通过小规模测试检验。" ], "limitations": [ "原文没有给出普遍成功保证或量化阈值。", "顺序与适用性取决于问题和现有证据。" ], "rationale": "测试可以产生新信息并改变下一步决策。", "steps": [ { "action": "选择一个小规模、低成本的测试，检验重要假设。", "input": "一项假设及其预测。", "output": "有信息价值的测试及结果。", "check": "检查测试是否产生新信息。" }, { "action": "比较结果与预测，在扩大规模前修正。", "input": "预测结果与实际结果。", "output": "修正的假设或下一步决策。", "check": "约束发生变化时，按需重新检查问题地图。" } ], "successChecks": [ "扩大规模前已经比较测试结果与预测。" ], "tags": [ "行动", "测试", "反馈" ], "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sources": [ { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00003" ], "quote": "Choose a small, low-cost test of an important assumption, compare its result with your\n\nprediction, and revise the assumption before scaling the action." }, { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00003" ], "quote": "These methods are complementary tools, not a guarantee of success." } ], "parents": [] }, { "id": "r-map", "version": "1.0.0", "kind": "rule", "name": "先画问题地图", "summary": "边界有助于识别相关信息", "problem": "问题范围不清晰时，难以判断哪些信息相关。", "when": "问题范围不清楚", "prerequisites": [ "能够描述问题和可观察的预期结果。" ], "limitations": [ "原文没有给出普遍成功保证或量化阈值。", "顺序与适用性取决于问题和现有证据。" ], "rationale": "边界有助于识别相关信息", "steps": [ { "action": "记录问题边界和相关方。", "input": "待解决的问题。", "output": "明确的范围与相关方清单。", "check": "检查清单中的事项是否属于问题范围。" }, { "action": "记录约束和可观察的成功标准。", "input": "已知约束与预期结果。", "output": "约束与成功标准。", "check": "确认成功标准可以观察。" } ], "successChecks": [ "边界、相关方、约束和可观察的成功标准均已明确。" ], "tags": [ "问题", "边界", "范围" ], "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "sources": [ { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00001" ], "quote": "Before choosing an action, record the problem boundary, stakeholders, constraints and an\n\nobservable success criterion." }, { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00003" ], "quote": "These methods are complementary tools, not a guarantee of success." } ], "parents": [] }, { "id": "r-evidence", "version": "1.0.0", "kind": "rule", "name": "收集证据并寻找反证", "summary": "一次观察不应被当作证明", "problem": "某项主张的支持不足，或存在多种可能解释。", "when": "对主张的信心不足", "prerequisites": [ "有可供检查的主张和相关观察。" ], "limitations": [ "原文没有给出普遍成功保证或量化阈值。", "顺序与适用性取决于问题和现有证据。" ], "rationale": "一次观察不应被当作证明", "steps": [ { "action": "区分观察与解释。", "input": "主张与现有观察。", "output": "区分可观察事实和解释。", "check": "确认解释没有被写成直接观察。" }, { "action": "寻找其他解释与反证。", "input": "当前解释。", "output": "其他解释与相关证据。", "check": "不能把单次观察当作证明；原文未规定数字化证据阈值。" } ], "successChecks": [ "观察与解释已分开，也考虑了其他解释。" ], "tags": [ "证据", "主张", "反证" ], "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "sources": [ { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00002" ], "quote": "Separate observations from explanations. Link conclusions to observations and look for\n\ncompeting explanations." }, { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00003" ], "quote": "These methods are complementary tools, not a guarantee of success." } ], "parents": [] }, { "id": "r-test", "version": "1.0.0", "kind": "rule", "name": "设计有信息价值的小试验", "summary": "结果可以更新假设并指导下一步行动", "problem": "讨论停滞，缺少能帮助决策的信息。", "when": "讨论停滞", "prerequisites": [ "一项重要假设可以通过小规模测试检验。" ], "limitations": [ "原文没有给出普遍成功保证或量化阈值。", "顺序与适用性取决于问题和现有证据。" ], "rationale": "结果可以更新假设并指导下一步行动", "steps": [ { "action": "选择一个小规模、低成本的测试，检验重要假设。", "input": "一项假设及其预测。", "output": "有信息价值的测试及结果。", "check": "检查测试是否产生新信息。" }, { "action": "比较结果与预测，在扩大规模前修正。", "input": "预测结果与实际结果。", "output": "修正的假设或下一步决策。", "check": "约束发生变化时，按需重新检查问题地图。" } ], "successChecks": [ "扩大规模前已经比较测试结果与预测。" ], "tags": [ "行动", "测试", "反馈" ], "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sources": [ { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00003" ], "quote": "Choose a small, low-cost test of an important assumption, compare its result with your\n\nprediction, and revise the assumption before scaling the action." }, { "locator": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00003" ], "quote": "These methods are complementary tools, not a guarantee of success." } ], "parents": [] } ] }, "methodology": { "schemaVersion": "learn-from-materials/methodology-v1", "id": "method-lab-systematic-whole", "version": "1.0.0", "language": "zh-CN", "status": "ready", "structure": "process", "title": "界定问题、检验证据、按结果修正", "problem": "怎样使用三种互补工具选择下一步行动？", "outcome": "明确的问题边界、经过检验的主张与有信息价值的小试验。", "evidence": "synthesis", "note": "合成教学示例。主线只是一个分析性的规划顺序，并非原文要求的固定步骤；条件和反馈可能改变下一步适合使用的工具。 示例源材料为本仓库自编的三页 PDF；与真实研究无关。 三种工具都可按当前问题与证据状态进入；入口集合不是固定必经顺序。", "entryNodes": [ "m-map", "m-evidence", "m-test" ], "mainPath": [ "m-map", "m-evidence", "m-test" ], "nodes": [ { "id": "m-map", "title": "界定问题", "role": "action", "input": "问题描述与当前约束。", "action": "记录边界、相关方、约束和可观察的成功标准。", "output": "明确的范围与标准。", "check": "检查标准可观察且边界明确。", "unitIds": [ "u01" ], "methodIds": [ "f-map", "r-map" ], "evidence": "material", "sources": [ { "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 1. Problem map · PDF第1页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00001" ], "quote": "When the scope is unclear, draw a problem map first" } ] }, { "id": "m-evidence", "title": "检验证据", "role": "action", "input": "主张及支撑它的观察。", "action": "区分观察与解释，寻找其他解释和反证。", "output": "可追溯的主张及尚存的不确定性。", "check": "不要把一次观察当作证明。", "unitIds": [ "u02" ], "methodIds": [ "f-evidence", "r-evidence" ], "evidence": "material", "sources": [ { "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 2. Evidence chain · PDF第2页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00002" ], "quote": "Separate observations from explanations." } ] }, { "id": "m-test", "title": "进行有信息价值的小试验", "role": "action", "input": "重要假设及预测。", "action": "用低成本试验对比结果与预测，在扩大行动前修正假设。", "output": "供下一步判断使用的新信息。", "check": "扩大行动前先对比预测与结果。", "unitIds": [ "u03" ], "methodIds": [ "f-action", "r-test" ], "evidence": "material", "sources": [ { "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页", "sourceIds": [ "src-451aaf991057-pdf_page-00003" ], "quote": "The result can update the evidence\n\nchain" } ] } ], "edges": [ { "id": "e-map-evidence", "from": "m-map", "to": "m-evidence", "kind": "main", "condition": "边界和标准已明确。", "handoff": "相关观察与验收标准。", "why": "一种分析性的规划顺序：范围可以帮助聚焦证据；原文没有强制这个顺序。", "evidence": "inference", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab · PDF第1–2页" }, { "id": "e-evidence-test", "from": "m-evidence", "to": "m-test", "kind": "main", "condition": "重要假设可用低成本试验检验。", "handoff": "假设及其预测。", "why": "一种分析性的规划顺序：主张帮助确定小试验检验什么。", "evidence": "inference", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab · PDF第2–3页" }, { "id": "e-direct-test", "from": "m-map", "to": "m-test", "kind": "branch", "condition": "讨论停滞且可以进行小试验。", "handoff": "已界定的问题与重要假设。", "why": "原文建议在讨论停滞时进行小试验；分支位置属于有条件的分析性安排。", "evidence": "inference", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" }, { "id": "e-return-evidence", "from": "m-test", "to": "m-evidence", "kind": "feedback", "condition": "试验结果带来新的观察时。", "handoff": "试验产生的新观察。", "why": "原文说明结果可以更新证据链。", "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" }, { "id": "e-return-map", "from": "m-test", "to": "m-map", "kind": "feedback", "condition": "约束变化：重看问题边界。", "handoff": "变化后的约束。", "why": "原文说明约束变化可使读者重新审视问题地图。", "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" } ], "coverage": [ { "unitId": "u01", "nodeIds": [ "m-map" ], "role": "core", "reason": "节点保留对应合成材料方法及其原始出处。" }, { "unitId": "u02", "nodeIds": [ "m-evidence" ], "role": "core", "reason": "节点保留对应合成材料方法及其原始出处。" }, { "unitId": "u03", "nodeIds": [ "m-test" ], "role": "core", "reason": "节点保留对应合成材料方法及其原始出处。" } ], "constraints": [ { "text": "这些互补工具不保证成功；顺序和适用性取决于问题与可用证据。", "evidence": "material", "source": "method-lab-synthetic.pdf · 标题路径：Method Lab > 3. Action loop · PDF第3页" } ] } }